unspeakablehorror: (Default)
[personal profile] unspeakablehorror
I think one misconception that often gets spread about anti-imperialism, even by people who support it, is that it entails the imperial core being 'worse off' than it is now. In reality, it would only necessarily entail change, which every choice, including the status quo, will entail. If we are going to characterize a situation as worse, I think we need to answer the questions of 'in what way' and 'for who' and 'compared to what', because I think those questions would also help illuminate how certain very important things, like housing, water, food, and medical support would actually be much better for the vast majority of people, regardless of where they live.

I mean, it's not going to be better for billionnaires of course, but who cares?

Are cheap bananas in the imperial core really 'better' than having enough food without worry? Than reliable healthcare?
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
unspeakablehorror

February 2026

S M T W T F S
123 4567
8 9 1011 121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728

Tag Cloud

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 9th, 2026 03:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios