unspeakablehorror: (Default)
So in the Murderbot Diaries Gurathin and Murderbot start off intensely disliking each other, and I found this one of the most enjoyable dynamics in both the book and the TV show. Characters who have to work together but hate each other are like catnip to me. Absolute best character dynamic two characters can have.

Interestingly, I think the TV show does more to develop this rivalry and the character of Gurathin than the books actually do. A big part of this is that the books don't actually give Gurathin a backstory, whereas the show does. And so while there are aspects of the books I definitely prefer, I'm giving the show a big W for how it took one of my favorite parts of the original story and made it even better.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
The Sith are kind of inherently edgy, but that doesn't mean that all the Sith are edgy to the same degree. So, time to rate them by how much they exemplify the Sith trait of edginess. For this I will be using my very scientific Edge Factor metric. So let's get started:

Darth Sidious: 6/10. Not a maximally edgelord aesthetic. Spends much of his life pretending to be an inoccuous good guy, which is diabolical but not edgy. Also by the time his aesthetic becomes more edgy, he's well established as an authority figure, which is not a particularly edgy role. Edgelords are more about tragic rebellion than ruling: so in this respect Sidious is a victim of his own success. All of *his* rebellions were successful, which *is* tragic, but not for him.

Darth Tyrannus: 4/10. Look, cut him some slack, he's not used to this Sith stuff. Still, he does have that tragic rebellion thing going for him re: the Jedi and Yoda.

Darth Plagueis: 5/10. Leave him alone, he just wants to do his evil science. Scalpels are edgy, right? Anyway surely he can just delegate the edginess to his apprentice? He wants to get back to his experiments. Little too much authority for the necessary rebelliousness, and takes *forever* to rebel against Tenebrous, though he does try to (unsuccessfully) end the rule of two.

Darth Maul: 10/10. Someone understood the assignment. Classy all black attire. Single earring. Double-bladed lightsaber. Rebels against Sidious multiple times, but never vanquishes him. Dies tragically trying to get revenge. Maximum edge.

Darth Vader: 8/10. Solid edge aesthetic and history of tragic rebellion, but gets points deducted for position of authority in the Empire.

Darth Bane: 8/10. A little too successful so gets a deduction for that, but the aesthetic and rebellion are *off the charts*. Guy rebelled against his father, the Jedi, *and* the Sith. Not to mention the face tattoos and invincibility beetles have incredible edge energy.

Darth Zannah: 8/10. Again, too successful for maximum edge, but solid aesthetic with the face tattoos, plenty of rebellion, and a tragic willingness to sacrifice her closest relative for her ambitions all makes her Edge Factor competitive.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Reading the Lilith's Brood trilogy by Octavia Butler. Still working my way through this trilogy, but I've finished the first book and I just think it's such a powerful statement about social dynamics on both a personal and societal level.

One of the consistent themes of Lilith's Brood is that there's a difference between loving someone and respecting them. The Oankali love humans. They don't respect them. And this story shows the horror of that lack of respect, the horror of giving help that the person being helped did not consent to.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)

A little over halfway through the novel now. So one thing you get to see in the Dispossessed is people both living in and arguing for different political and economic systems. Which despite the didacticism, is still a nice change of pace from most science fiction, which usually keeps such concerns secondary or else in line with government propaganda.  This can be unintentional at times, but regardless of the intention, it tends to promote uncritical acceptance of our unimaginably violent status quo. The Dispossessed doesn't do this. It might seem strange that I consider the didacticism a negative quality given my interest in the political and economic themes--however I disagree that such ideas need to be presented in a dry or didactic way. I think if one wants to primarily teach, nonfiction is a much better medium for that. I feel stories are better at spurring us to ask better questions than they are at giving us answers to those questions.
 

Read more... )

 

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Anyone have suggestions for hard sci-fi that has good characterization? Most of the stories I've encountered tend to do one or the other, but not both. Mostly looking for novels, but other mediums are fine.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Voyager episodes are always so unpredictable in their quality. Everything from the tragically terrible to the transcendently wonderful is possible here. And of course then there are the lizards.

Nimona

Jul. 28th, 2023 06:22 pm
unspeakablehorror: (Default)

Oh, I watched Nimona recently. I thought it was fun but also feel it fell rather short of what it could have been.
Read more... )

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
My heart super went out to T'Pring in the last episode, when we learn about her mother.

They say that Vulcans are not emotive. But no one does the 'dead inside' expression better than a Vulcan, and no Vulcan has emoted this as ably as T'Pring.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)

So a little about my Star Trek background:

I have seen:

  • The Original Series (long time ago, though, so I don't remember it very well)
  • The 6 movies for the Original Series
  • The Next Generation (also only watched much of it a long time ago, only rewatched a few episodes recently)
  • Deep Space Nine (saw a little bit back when it was originally airing, watched it all from beginning to end in the last few years)
  • Voyager (saw some of it when it originally aired, watching much more of it now--not all the way through it yet, have never watched the ending)
  • 3 JJ Abrams reboot movies
  • Discovery - Watched all of it up to the end of season 4.
  • Picard - Watched all 3 seasons of it.
  • Lower Decks - Watched all 3 seasons of it.
  • Strange New Worlds - Watched entire first season.

Favorites

#1 Favorite Overall: Deep Space Nine

Favorite movie: Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home

#1 Favorite new Trek: Discovery

Second favorite new Trek: specifically season 2, and *only* season 2, of Picard.

Favorite novel: I, Q by John de Lancie and Peter David (though I haven't read many of the novels and it's been quite a while since I read this one)

unspeakablehorror: (Default)

Usually I'd be more annoyed about the relative lack of alien characters in a Star Wars show than I am for Andor.  A lot of my favorite characters are some sort of alien.  But I also respect the limitations of putting an alien character front and center in a visual live-action  medium, especially when it comes to Disney shows.  A lot of energy has to be put into the look of a character like that or the result can detract from the show.  

I certainly feel like this has been the case for pretty much every alien character that's had any significant live action role in a Star Wars show excepting baby Yoda (AKA Grogu).  And baby Yoda doesn't, ah, fit the mood of Andor as a show.  I really appreciate that Andor characters can use their faces to their full extent and that we don't have to deal with them wearing the typical 'bad cosplay' look I've seen for characters like the Grand Inquisitor in the Obi-Wan show. 

And we still see alien characters!  They're just not particularly prominent in the narrative. Still, the ones we do see look appropriately Star Warsy without being so well known as characters or species that you're likely to feel they 'look wrong'.  

Anyway, as one of the few Snoke fans, I'm going to have to say that I think Andy Serkis's Kino Loy is still a much better character than Snoke ever was.  Because story and authenticity will beat out even the biggest-budget special effects of a movie every time.

Sci-Fi

Aug. 21st, 2022 08:56 pm
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I think I'll have plenty of things to keep me occupied when I'm recovering after surgery, but I'm going to see if I can watch Babylon 5 and/or Farscape then.  I've never seen any of Babylon 5 and I only saw a few episodes of Farscape a long time ago, so I don't remember much about it but it seemed vaguely interesting.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Was thinking about how much I wish I was a better essay writer because I'd love to write a long detailed essay comparing the politics of Star Wars and Star Trek and how I think that key among their differences is that Star Wars is a dystopia and Star Trek is a utopia.  This is one of the things that I think makes comparing them in a 'which is better' fashion, despite their superficial similarities (eg. genre, era of creation), an apples to oranges comparison.  What makes an exploration of utopian ideals interesting is inherently different from what makes an exploration of dystopia interesting.  Star Wars is a galaxy in collapse, stuck in a cycle of destruction and rebirth.  Star Trek is about a galaxy coming together and the creation of peace.  

In Star Wars, the war is never won.  Victory is inevitably followed by defeat in a seemingly unbreakable cycle.  Justice and happiness are transitory, fleeting, an illusion.  Star Wars is a tragedy unfolding slowly.

In Star Trek, war is beaten back by peace, intolerance by understanding.  The depths of despair may be deep, but emergence is inevitable.  Star Trek is a story of hope with a happy ending.

Additionally, despite being the happier tale overall, Star Trek is written more with adults in mind despite being rated so it could be viewed by children, whereas Star Wars was always written with selling toys in mind and thus was written to appeal to children first and foremost.  Star Trek is also the much more explicitly didactic of the two--I've mentioned before that Star Wars is much more confused in its politics but that lack of clarity makes it much less explicit in its politics as well.  

Where the narratives coincide, however, is the mutual scorn they share for conservatives.  This is not to say that Gene Roddenberry and George Lucas share identical politics, because I think it's clear they have some very important differences in that respect.  But having seen a great deal of both and having seen a number of interviews with Lucas in how he characterizes the political aspect of his work, it seems pretty clear to me that he is often criticizing contemporary American conservatives (and I'd say that J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson's works also sort of do this in addition to revisiting the political moment of the original trilogy by it's narrative reenactment).  And I think the scorn for conservatives Roddenberry has is communicated clearly by the didacticism of Trek.

I just have so many thoughts on this and I don't think I could elucidate them all properly or even write them all down.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I finished Revenant Gun.  Kujen is my favorite.  Probably due to my fondness of mad scientist villains who want to be immortal.  Also because I enjoy characters who have a sense of style.  And because I love villains who are clearly enjoying themselves while being unaplogetically ruthless.  

I think this trilogy does a good job with its reveals.  There are usually multiple plot-related reveals in this book and in the larger series, and I appreciate the way they're constructed to both illuminate details about the worldbuilding and function as satisfying twists and turns.

This series is quite consistent in its style and quality, so I think whatever a person's opinion of the first two novels are will likely transfer over to this one as well.  That was certainly my experience.  I enjoyed the fantastical math/science/engineering aspect and how that was employed throughout the series.

I feel the second half of the novel is where it really picks up for me--the first half is a bit slow for my taste.  I'm a very impatient person so this is something that makes a significant difference to me.  Though I've still read much slower novels.

I would have liked for a certain plot thread to have received more attention.  I'll have to see if maybe there's a satisfactory conclusion for that one in Glass Cannon.

Anyway, those are a few of my thoughts about this novel.

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Last night I finished watching Steven Universe Future.  I really enjoyed the series.  I also really like how the complete collection boxed set is designed like a scrapbook.

I think Steven Universe Future is such a nice epilogue for the series.  And it has enough episodes (2 disks of them) to really ask some interesting questions about what happens after the big fight is over.

Purpose

Feb. 10th, 2021 04:49 am
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
One of my favorite episodes of Steven Universe is Lion 4: Alternate Ending. It's the one where he tries to figure out what his destiny is by 'decoding' his mother's videotape.Spoilers... )

Lost Phone

Feb. 8th, 2021 03:38 am
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
This episode is about Pearl losing her phone...inside her own gem.  Bizarre and yet so incredibly relateable haha. 
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I am currently working on watching the rest of Steven Universe since I left off partway through when I was watching the series.  I really enjoy the whole 'musical sci-fi' aspect of this show a lot, not to mention all the different themes to think about.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
It's somewhat vexing to me that I have so much trouble reading stories that aren't in the fantasy or sci-fi genres.  I may be more open to different plotlines and themes than I was when I was younger, but there's still a part of me that's 5 years old and needs to see some weird stuff.  This isn't to say that I think fantasy and sci-fi can't be intellectual, because I think there's plenty of both that is, but that I'm probably missing out on a lot of good stuff because of my resistance to reading outside these genres. Though also, I think I would find it a lot more painful to read a bad story outside of these genres than I do to read bad stories inside of them.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Have never really got into Dune.  Maybe because I've only tried to watch the movies/shows, not read the books.  But every time I hear someone describe the story in any form, it just sounds sort of unappealing.  Given my small knowledge of the story, my summary for it is thus: Everyone is doing drugs, but not the fun type, apparently.  Negative amounts of fun are being had.  Top drug dealer is an inherited title?  Maybe a giant worm is going to pop out and eat someone.  The giant worms are the only ones having any fun.  Oh, and there's some really pretentious line about fear.
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 08:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios