unspeakablehorror: (Default)
There's a huge problem with how problems like food contamination (eg. heavy metals) are often communicated: no numbers!  Someone will say some food contains 'a lot' or 'a little' contamination, but this is really not helpful for communicating relative risk.  What are the actual amounts?  What levels should these values be under to be recognized as generally safe?  It's impossible to have no contamination, and it makes a big difference if something is thought to be under safe (or at least negligibly affecting) levels, vs twice that level, vs 200 times that level.  That makes a difference! 

Profile

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
unspeakablehorror

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45 678 910
111213141516 17
1819 2021 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Page Summary

Tag Cloud

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 06:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios