unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I do wish I were better at climate activism.  I feel like this is an urgent problem that needs more attention than it gets and that lifestyle changes, while sometimes positive, are not remotely adequate to address it. 

I also think dialogue on it needs to go beyond 'it exists', which is too often where it ends.  In order to solve a problem, it needs to be discussed in its specifics.  Not all 'solutions' proposed to this issue are actually realistic, possible, just, or compatible with each other.

I also don't think this issue is seperable from other social justice issues, and especially not from other types of environmental activism (eg. pollution and mass extinctions).

But my skills on writing about what I know on these issues are not as developed as I'd like them to be for sure.  It's not that I don't have things I want to say, but actually articulating them fully is difficult for me.  It's very frustrating.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I think food forests need to be redeveloped as a technology to be a viable replacement to the current agricultural model.  Though this concept would not need to be limited to forests.  Someone could implement this concept on a prarie, a beach, or even a desert.  The point is just to implement agriculture that allows itself to be a regenerative part of the natural world rather than a devastating ecological harm to it. 

A fundamental point would be the elimination of the idea that people can own land.  Ownership should be for personal possessions (which would include structures like a home).  One should have the right to a certain amount of personal space in the area in which they live, so they could still stipulate a very small area outside their home not be subject to regular foot traffic, but they would not actually own any land outside their home.  Instead, they would have rights and responsibilities in relation to that land much like people do with libraries and other public property.  Rights would include being able to cultivate and harvest food from the land, and responsibilities would include protecting the land from environmental damage.  Even areas not subject to regular foot traffic outside of a home could be subject to periodic oversight by others to ensure one is fulfilling their responsibilities to the land.  
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
The thing is, any farming done that is separate from the natural ecosystem is not local.  Any farming that considers the natural ecosystem 'just worthless empty space' without it is not local.  Any farming done that uses the pesticides or antibiotics or fertilizer or machines or buildings that use nonlocal inputs for nonlocally obtained seeds or nonlocally obtained animals is not local.  And anything that's going to end up in a waste dump who knows where rather than naturally composting back into the environment is not local.  And any farming that produces massive unnatural amounts of animal dung that ultimately contaminates the water supply and kills local ecosystems while spiking food poisoning rates is not local--it is the destruction of local and the fouling of our own food supply.  And massive cattle monocultures or banana monocultures or cotton monocultures or sugar monocultures or any other monoculture is not local.  Destroying the natural environment to make chocolate or coffee or leather or any other commodity at the expense of the local population (or offloading that expense to some other locality) is not local.  It's a system built on blood in the whole, and the whole of it needs to change.  But as long as people use the language of social justice to prop their favored portions of it up, to reduce environmental activism to the purchase of indulgences like 'local', it won't be going anywhere at all. 

Batteries

Jan. 5th, 2022 02:55 pm
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Just some thoughts about lithium ion batteries and battery waste:

Read more... )

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
In the wake of countries like China and India deciding (for good reason) not to accept the rest of the world's plastic waste anymore, I have to wonder what's been happening to all the previously recycled plastic waste recently. Is it just being landfilled?  Dumped in the ocean?  Where is it going?  I know a lot of countries scaled back their recycling systems immensely after they started shipping that stuff out of country, so they simply don't have the capacity to recycle most of that.  So it's definitely not being recycled for the most part, I'd guess.  Even before the recent changes a lot of things people thought were being recycled weren't either because they weren't actually suitable to be recycled or because they weren't properly prepared beforehand (I understand that different recycling plants all have different rules on what they'll accept based on how the plant is set up, but the general public is rarely made aware of these rules).
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I was browsing this article to try to understand a bit more about the plastic waste issue:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/06/plastic-planet-waste-pollution-trash-crisis/


I thought this part was especially helpful for my understanding of the issue:

The largest market for plastics today is for packaging materials. That trash now accounts for nearly half of all plastic waste generated globally; most of it never gets recycled or incinerated.

One problem: people get focused on legislation for miniscule portions of that problem--like plastic straws, which account for much less than 1% of all plastic waste [citation needed, though, lol] and are literally lifesaving devices for certain disabled people [again citation needed, but I've seen compelling arguments for this as well].  That doesn't mean that people who don't need them shouldn't avoid their use, but it does mean that we need to put their potential benefits and harms into perspective before determining how to address the behavior of other people on this matter.

We will need much more major changes to make a dent in single use plastics (which I suspect are largely synonymous with this packaging category).  And legislation, while it may be necessary in some cases, can't help us adjust to the lifestyle changes that will be necessary if we truly address this issue.  For a lot of reasons I won't be elaborating on right now to avoid more citations-needed, I don't believe recycle and forget it is the answer here.  I do think there is a role for plastic recycling, but I also believe it has to be greatly secondary to the roles of reduction and reuse in order to make a real difference here.

Profile

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
unspeakablehorror

February 2026

S M T W T F S
123 4567
8 9 1011 121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Tag Cloud

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 11th, 2026 03:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios