unspeakablehorror: (Default)
[personal profile] unspeakablehorror
It occurs to me that a lot of the vital studies done to understand the flow of resources, while many times utilizing advanced scientific techniques, are essentially, at their core, accountancy.  Like the study I mentioned in my earlier post today about the aquifers.  That's all about measuring the inflows and outflows of water.  Climate change studies do that too, via measurement of greenhouse gases and other related indicators.  Maybe one of the problems in our world is that there are too many accountants focused on money and not enough focused on the environment.

Date: 2019-09-08 12:01 pm (UTC)
tobermoriansass: (Default)
From: [personal profile] tobermoriansass
There's actually some interesting work being done in this field but from the point of view of calculating ecological debt, externalities and ecosystems services use. And I definitely really appreciate the work Alf Hornborg and Lundt University's department of Human ecology have done in calculating inequality as unequal energy flows. But you're right - there's not enough very solid work being done on natural resource accounting. Some people are doing it, but I really detest the natural capital movement for how it instrumentalizes what is a free public good as a resource - not bad in its way, but when it's coopted by guys like Credit Suisse for "research", you know it's a bad scene and I don't want green accountancy to turn into a tool for enclosing and colonizing the last of our global commons.

...which is a tangent to your post but tl;dr I think you might find some interesting stuff in the field of ecological debt and ecosystems services studies?

Profile

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
unspeakablehorror

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12345 67
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Tag Cloud

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 10:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios