unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I feel that a lot of Star Wars analysis is plagued by a really individualistic analysis that boils the morality of characters and institutions down to questions like 'did the Jedi treat Anakin badly' or 'Was Anakin not grateful enough to the Jedi' or 'was this one individual responsible for literally all the evil things that happened'. Like determining the morality of the Jedi or the Senate (the one with multiple people, not the Sith Lord) is all about how they behaved towards one person (or how one person behaved towards them) and not about how the political dynamic these groups were responsible for impacted civilization as a whole.

The analysis of the morality of the Jedi should also not hinge on whether or not the Sith were the good guys. The Sith were not the good guys. Even though I think the Jedi perpetuated great evil (for which the extended canon provides ample evidence) that doesn't mean I think they 'deserved' what happened to them. And even though I think the Senate was irreperably corrupt, that doesn't mean I think Palpatine improved matters by dissolving them. Palpatine didn't make the galaxy safer or more peaceful, but he also didn't have to exert much effort to obtain the result he wanted because the Senate was already corrupt, because the Jedi perpetuated an ideal of 'lawful goodness', an ideal that Palpatine was able to turn against them to have them serve his bidding, to turn them into their own executioners, as encapsulated so perfectly by his manipulation of Anakin, a manipulation that results in Anakin siding with the lawful (and thus good by the teachings of the Jedi) position of defending the Chancellor to ensure he has a fair trial. In defending a man he knows to be a Sith against illegality, just as the Jedi compromised their morality to defend the Republic and the Senate (both of them) against the illegal Outer Rim Separatist Alliance it had allowed corporate powers to exploit for untold generations--unless it is completely fine and democratic for corporations to have representatives in the Senate? Unless it is totally normal and okay to lead an army of literal slaves into battle?

Of course the main characters are central to the themes of the prequels. But I don't know how one gets anywhere useful without being able to see those characters not only as characters, but as allegories of the failings of institutions as a whole, and to see the institutions not just as a few characters whose actions one judges either positively or negatively depending on their personal conduct towards other characters, but as a larger whole made up of not just good or bad individuals, but of laws and culture and philosophy and behavior that affects society as a whole.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I keep thinking about how I will force Plagueis and Qui-Gon to complete a group project together in my story.  This is very important.  I've always been disappointed that the only time they meet in any Star Wars media is that really short scene in the Darth Plagueis novel.  I just have to do something about the fact that Plagueis is like some simultaneous narrative foil and mirror to Qui-Gon what with the whole immortality thing, emphasis on the Living Force, and opposing their own Order in some manner, but just in these very diametrically different ways.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
The thing about the Jedi that makes their no attachments rule a problem isn't that that can't be interpreted in a reasonable way as not having obsessive or possessive attachments.  It's that their implementation of this is absolutely in line with cult behavior.  If all close attachments outside of the Jedi are considered  so obsessive and possessive that they think they have to be severed or prevented, that's not at all a good sign.  And this is canonically how the Jedi treat attachments and commitments outside themselves.  There's just no universe in which I will judge it okay to take children from their families or caretakers and isolate them from outside society 'for their own good'.   Not to mention their similar behavior regarding romantic relationships.  Like not every cult is a death cult.  They can have genuinely positive qualities!  That doesn't make their controlling, possessive, and obsessive cult behavior okay!
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I just had a sudden brainwave which produced for me yet another ridiculously rare rarepair: Darth Traya/Jocasta Nu. Sith + Jedi librarian pairing where they are BOTH librarians!  Oh, I love it! 

There's also a very easy method whereby they could meet when they are of similar age: Darth Traya gets frozen in carbonite for, like, however many millenia apart they are.  Maybe an AU ending where the Jedi Exile freezes Traya at the end of KOTOR II, and then she doesn't get found until, like, the prequels era or something.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
 Just finished watching Episode I today.  One thing the Sith and Jedi have in common: they both like to take off their outer robes when they fight.  Though Sidious doesn't do that.  I guess it's a Naboo thing to fight in wildly impractical clothing. 

But I mean, if they're always taking them off, why wear the outer robes to begin with?  We all know the answer: because they look cool. Though Maul's robes are obviously the coolest.  10/10 best outfit.  That boring brown stuff the Jedi wear just can't compare.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
That meme of the man asking if what he's seeing is a pigeon when it's a butterfly but he's a Jedi asking if this is healthy emotional detachment and the butterfly is labeled 'emotional repression'.

Profile

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
unspeakablehorror

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45 678 910
111213141516 17
1819 2021 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Tag Cloud

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 05:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios