unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I usually have a lot of thoughts and it would be great to write more of them down, but I just don't always have the words for them.

A Busy Day

Nov. 6th, 2024 11:15 pm
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
It's been a busy day for me! In fact there's still things I want to do before I go to sleep. Still, I have accomplished a few tasks, so that counts for something I think.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I've said this before, but I'll say it again--the word 'terrorist' should not be used.

'Terrorist' is a word people use to justify the war crimes of imperial and colonial interests. It doesn't help in understanding people's political motivations. It doesn't help in describing the amount of violence someone uses. It is applied to the political enemies of empire, regardless of the strategies or level of violence used. It is frequently a racist dogwhistle.

Stop calling Hamas terrorists. Not only does it serve to equate the actions of Hamas with the Israeli military (and therefore devalue Palestinian lives by giving the implication that Israel was at all justified in committing genocide), it decontextualizes the actions of both Hamas and Israel. 

And I want to be clear, calling them both terrorists also equates them! The solution is not to expand the usage of this word, but eliminate it.

We need to be descriptive and specific when we describe people or groups in a political context, in a military context. Obfuscation of specifics is the enemy of finding solutions and it is the enemy of creating the conditions for peace.

And I'm mentioning Hamas specifically because Palestine is very much at the forefront of my attention right now, but this applies to all other groups too, whether they're environmental activists or Hamas or animal activists or Al Qaeda or the KKK. These are all very different groups--calling them by the same term obfuscates that fact. Not only that, but given how racialized the term has become, it's practically a racial slur against arabs, and people who aren't part of the affected group shouldn't be trying to repurpose or 'reclaim' slurs that have been applied to that group.

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
It's deplorable that our society essentially makes being poor and not sufficiently likeable a death sentence, but if someone's rich they can commit any amount of mass murder and theft as well as being the most unpleasant person imaginable all while being actively protected by society. In fact protecting these people is the entire purpose of our capitalist society.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)

The FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Program Has a New Target: Animal Rights Activists


The FBI has been collaborating with the meat industry to gather information on animal rights activism, including Meat the Victims, under its directive to counter weapons of mass destruction, or WMD, according to agency records recently obtained by the nonprofit Animal Partisan through Freedom of Information Act litigation. The records also show that the bureau has explored charging activists who break into factory farms under federal criminal statutes that carry a possible sentence of up to life in prison — including for the “attempted use” of WMD — while urging meat producers to report encounters with activists to its WMD program.

Animal rights lawyers and advocates view this new frontier for WMD allegations as a pretense, a fictive way to legitimize the criminal prosecution of animal rights activists. 

The FBI declined to comment on these plans or clarify whether it is still actively considering charging activists under statutes for WMD. 

“This kind of escalation in charging or threats of charges is textbook escalation by government actors against successful efforts by social movements that they disagree with or find subversive,” said Justin Marceau, a law professor who runs a legal clinic for animal activists at the University of Denver. “The very framing of civil disobedience against factory farms as terrorism is a form of government repression.”

I'm used to the government labelling animal rights activists as terrorists, but the WMD accusation is a new one for me. I guess they figured the WMD lie worked for Iraq, so why not branch out?

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I finished the Lilith's Brood trilogy by Octavia Butler recently and I found it a really easy and engaging read. Not sure how much of that has to do with my interest in the story concept and how much is to do with the writing style, but I just breezed through it.

The Oankali are so fascinating in the contradictions they embody. They judge humanity as needing to have our autonomy stripped from us because they believe us to be inherently hierarchical. Eventually it's shown that the Oankali don't have any leaders and make political decisions via consensus. I really enjoyed seeing how their political process works. They do a sort of mind meld where they are still distinct entities but are able to very directly interface with each other to make decisions.

I love the detailed worldbuilding in this series.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Reading the Lilith's Brood trilogy by Octavia Butler. Still working my way through this trilogy, but I've finished the first book and I just think it's such a powerful statement about social dynamics on both a personal and societal level.

One of the consistent themes of Lilith's Brood is that there's a difference between loving someone and respecting them. The Oankali love humans. They don't respect them. And this story shows the horror of that lack of respect, the horror of giving help that the person being helped did not consent to.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
One of the worst things to me about the way hope is so often framed is that it becomes just as much of an action-killer, as much a curiosity-killer, as the nihilism that those who push it so often rail against.

Why do you seem so desperate for us to do anything? Just have hope. (How is it different from 'why do anything, there is no hope')

Don't tell me bad news. You're trying to make me lose hope. (Not so different from 'why bother keeping up with the news when there's nothing to be done about any of it')

It serves no one to depend on a hope of platitudes, of ignorance and lies.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I see no inherent contradiction in caring about both the individual and the collective; on the contrary, I think it's important to be able to see people from both perspectives to do justice to their needs. To care about people as a whole, you have to care about the autonomy of the individuals in that whole. And to care about individuals, you have to care about the environment they exist within, which includes the society they live in.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)

Am thoroughly convinced that for capitalism, space travel is a staggeringly difficult or even entirely intractable problem. The issue is in the incompatibility of the means to the purpose.

Capitalism is immensely concerned with short term growth, while any returns on developing space travel won't be seen for decades if not centuries or millennia. That's too long of a timeframe for the quarterly earnings cycle.

Capitalism is about profit, and not about the enrichment of human life. In fact, as we see time and time again, capitalism operates in opposition to the enrichment of human life. We have more than enough food to feed every human on Earth, but according to capitalism doing so would be a grievous crime against stochkholders and CEOs.

A lot of the benefits space travel might pose to humanity are of no benefit at all for capitalism. Preventing our extinction in the long run? Capitalism doesn't care about that. It's perfectly happy to continue barrelling towards our extinction in the short term while destroying people's lives and our environment.  Capitalism has no foresight--if not checked, and soon, it will smother our species into an early grave. The ability to escape the rancid political environment of the Earth? No benefit for capitalism, which currently holds a dominant position here. Exploration and discovery? Valueless under a regime of profit above all.

On the contrary, for capitalism, the promise of space travel exists as another way for CEOs to scam money from the government and subsidize their quest for endless profit with the tax dollars of the poor.

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
The Overthrow of Democracy in Chile — A Timeline

September 11, 1973: The Chilean military launches a coup. The Junta, headed by commander in chief of the army, General Augusto Pinochet, declares itself the government, proclaims a State of Internal War, imposes martial law and carries out a brutal campaign to destroy areas of resistance. At least 10,000 Chileans and foreigners are held in the national stadium. (In 2011, the Chilean government acknowledged that more than 40,000 people had been murdered, disappeared, or tortured by the Pinochet dictatorship.) Allende and his aides die defending the national palace — they had refused to surrender. (Some were killed, Allende committed suicide.) In his last radio address, Allende says,

Probably Radio Magallanes will be silenced, and the calm metal of my voice will not reach you: It does not matter. You will continue to hear me, I will always be beside you or at least my memory will be that of a dignified man, that of a man who is loyal.

The country is closed to the outside world for a week. No one is allowed out or in; all borders and international airports are closed; international communications are cut.
Marxist political parties are outlawed, leftist newspapers, radio and TV stations closed. Congress is closed. The constitution is abolished. All mayors and locally elected representatives are removed and replaced by active or retired military officers. The largest labor union, with 800,000 members, is outlawed.
The Junta makes an effort to erase all traces of the popular culture of the Allende years: public burning of books, posters, newspapers; all murals and wall paintings obliterated; the leftist poet Pablo Neruda’s home is ransacked and his manuscripts disappear; use of the term compañero to address one another is outlawed, certain musical instruments associated with the “New Song” movement are banned. The heads of all universities are replaced with military appointees.
The Junta returns control of more than 350 factories nationalized by the Popular Unity government to previous owners; worker participation and management is abolished; wage increases are canceled. U.S. companies announce interest in reinvesting in Chile. The U.S.-dominated InterAmerican Development Bank grants Chile a $65 million loan. U.S. banks begin lending millions of dollars to the Pinochet regime.
October 5, 1973: The Nixon administration grants $24.5 million in wheat credits to the Junta in Chile.
“It is clear,” said a U.S. Senate committee report, “the CIA received intelligence reports on the coup planning of the group which carried out the successful September 11th coup throughout the months of July, August, and September 1973.”
September 17, 1974: President Gerald Ford: What the United States did in Chile was “in the best interest of the people in Chile and certainly in our own best interests.”

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
How many gigawatts do you think unlimited power produces? Can Palpatine's force lightning be used to operate a power plant? Could you plug him into a spaceship and use him as a battery?

The Ocean

Sep. 7th, 2024 02:05 am
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
海洋 - hai3yang2-ocean 🌊

游泳 -you2yong3 -swim

她在海洋游泳了。
she swam in the ocean.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
If a tv or movie series gets new shows or movies released that are awful and completely at odds with the rest of the series, I don't think "oh now the entire series is ruined", I think "isn't it great that I can decide that none of this new nonsense ever happened, because this is fiction so whatever I decide can just replace canon whenever I want". Makes things a lot less stressful for me. And if there's a bit here or there that I actually like? Sure, that part happened--none of the rest of it did, though. What do you mean, I can't do that? I'll do whatever I want. I just added a dog with a jetpack now. You can't stop me.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
I don't think it's possible for most of us to have an anxietyless social media experience because I don't think it's possible for most of us to have anxietyless social experiences in general, but I do think the setup of the social media platform itself makes a big difference.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
To each their own but personally I do not have to like the protagonist as a person to appreciate or even enjoy a story. Have read many novels I cherish where I'd love to shove the protag into a woodchipper. Sometimes the author even does this sort of thing intentionally.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)
Does anyone know of any novels that take place in fictional anarchist and/or communist societies (besides Ursula K Le Guin or Star Trek, since I already know about those)? Doesn't have to be depicted as a utopia, but cannot be a dystopia. Should contain some sort of worldbuilding, but doesn't need to be sci-fi or fantasy or  contain any other speculative elements.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)

Disney Says Man Whose Wife Died at Resort Can’t Sue Because He Had a Disney+ Subscription

Disney is currently trying to get a “wrongful death” lawsuit thrown out on the basis that the grieving widower who brought the case signed up for a free-trial of Disney+ five years ago. The company’s streaming services has a policy that redirects legal grievances from litigation to forced arbitration. Corporate lawyers are now arguing that this policy is somehow relevant to a case involving a woman’s death at one of its resorts.

CNN reports that the plaintiff in the case, Jeffrey Piccolo, filed a lawsuit after his wife, 42-year-old medical doctor Kanokporn Tangsuan, died at Disney Springs, one of the company’s Florida locations, in 2023. Piccolo and Tansuan had dined at one of the resort’s restaurants, where they were repeatedly assured by their waiter that Tansuan’s meal could be prepared without dairy or nuts, ingredients to which Tansuan was deathly allergic. Not long after eating the meal, Tansuan went into anaphylactic shock and passed away. A medical examiner’s investigation into Tansuan’s death found that her “cause of death was as a result of anaphylaxis due to elevated levels of dairy and nut in her system,” the suit states.

Reminder that every day is a good day to boycott Disney.

unspeakablehorror: (Default)
While I generally prefer to be cordial to others and there are aspects of my conduct I'd like to smooth over, some of my rough edges are by design. Doing the right thing for myself or even from an ethical standpoint isn't always about being nicer or more polite.
unspeakablehorror: (Default)

To only be able to see people from a perspective of whether or not you like them or get along with them, or whether you agree with their politics, or in general in any way mediated primarily how they relate to you is to see a person from a very narrow perspective.

And the remedy to this is not to change how you relate to others, because even if successful, that may only exchange one narrow perspective for another. The answer is to look beyond your personal relations to others to broaden your understanding of them. A person doesn't exist purely in relation to you, just as you do not exist purely in relation to them.

Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 12:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios